<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>mikeash.com pyblog/introducing-plweakcompatibility.html comments</title><link>http://www.mikeash.com/?page=pyblog/introducing-plweakcompatibility.html#comments</link><description>mikeash.com Recent Comments</description><lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 02:31:34 GMT</lastBuildDate><generator>PyRSS2Gen-1.0.0</generator><docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs><item><title>Robert Payne - 2012-05-13 04:22:27</title><link>http://www.mikeash.com/?page=pyblog/introducing-plweakcompatibility.html#comments</link><description>Reflecting on whether or not this will be allowed in the app store.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;If it gets rejected while it's a little bit of work to retro-fit it to use just MAZeroingWeakRef it's not more than maybe an hour or two work depending on how much you used the __weak symbol.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;There are some API calls that will end up in your binary that otherwise wouldn't exist in iOS 4.0, those specifically being objc_initWeak, objc_storeWeak, objc_destroyWeak.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;Only time will tell.</description><guid isPermaLink="true">ce487c630bf529fa6100c5c1184de2cf</guid><pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 04:22:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>mikeash - 2012-04-07 18:08:57</title><link>http://www.mikeash.com/?page=pyblog/introducing-plweakcompatibility.html#comments</link><description>The procedure for adding it to your own project is so simple that I'm not sure it would be worthwhile. I wouldn't object if somebody else wanted to put one together, though!</description><guid isPermaLink="true">007683322588130fbb51c3b21252bc13</guid><pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 18:08:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Ben Scheirman - 2012-04-06 15:19:54</title><link>http://www.mikeash.com/?page=pyblog/introducing-plweakcompatibility.html#comments</link><description>This is awesome!  Have you considered creating a Podspec for this?  &lt;a href="https://github.com/CocoaPods/CocoaPods/wiki/A-pod-specification"&gt;https://github.com/CocoaPods/CocoaPods/wiki/A-pod-specification&lt;/a&gt;</description><guid isPermaLink="true">934c0169bea06d467b293ce7abd3d93a</guid><pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 15:19:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>mikeash - 2012-04-03 00:31:43</title><link>http://www.mikeash.com/?page=pyblog/introducing-plweakcompatibility.html#comments</link><description>I don't anticipate any problems with review, since the symbols in question are ones the compiler inserts automatically, so they wouldn't be considered "private" API. So while I can't predict the whims of Apple's reviewers on any given day, I don't see how this code would cause any more trouble than usual.</description><guid isPermaLink="true">5087b409ed4638e8b4714df71232d456</guid><pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 00:31:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Felix Schulze - 2012-04-01 15:57:11</title><link>http://www.mikeash.com/?page=pyblog/introducing-plweakcompatibility.html#comments</link><description>__weak on iOS 4 sounds really nice. Could there any problems with the App Store Review?</description><guid isPermaLink="true">49716a6ed122772a89cf2a49a5e6dbdb</guid><pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 15:57:11 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
